|
By Grazyna Fosar and Franz Bludorf
During a course we gave in Berlin some time ago, we
happened to notice a young woman in the audience,
Patricia B. She had a thick bandage wrapped around
her right forearm.When
we inquired about this, she told us that she had a
painful, protracted case of tendonitis, and she even
asked us to help her, since medical treatment up to
that point yielded no results.We
did not have anything on hand for treatment purposes
that day, and yet we did know a possible way to give
this woman first aid, at least.We
took a cell phone from its pouch and made a call – to
keep it simple, to the answering machine in our
office. As soon as the connection was made, Franz
pointed the cell phone’s antenna towards Patricia’s
forearm, and at the same time spoke a few positive,
healing affirmations: “Your arm is back to normal. In
every cell of your arm, the DNA is seeing to it that
everything will again function in a normal, healthy
manner.”The
entire procedure only lasted a few minutes. Patricia
reported that her lower arm tingled and felt very
warm during this period. Even after these few minutes
she felt a significant improvement in her
condition.When
we met with the group again one week later, we saw
that Patricia had come without a bandage this time.
When we asked her how she was doing, it turned out
that she could almost completely forget the problem
with the tendonitis. The pain did not come
back.The
other participants in the course listened to this
actually quite personal conversation with great
interest, and soon we ascertained that everyone in
the group who owned a cell phone had brought it with
them this particular day. Naturally we were asked to
explain the apparent “miracle” of healing by cell
phone.It
goes without saying that this was no miracle, but a
thoroughly explainable event nowadays. First,
however, to demonstrate that this was not just a
matter of chance, we asked participants who owned
cell phone to “call up their DNA” in a similar
manner, while pointing the device to some part of
their body with minor problems.Whenever
a relatively large group of people are sitting
together in one place, you can be sure that the group
will include some people who are experiencing some
kind of pain, or whose bodies are otherwise not as
they should be. This occasion was no exception, and
the results of this unusual experiment were
astonishing. Within a few minutes, an older woman was
rid of her headache, and a man was rid of the
discomfort in his stomach that he had felt since
lunchtime.This
brings up two questions. First: Is there a scientific
explanation for what happened to these people? And
second: Can cell phones be considered therapeutic
devices from now on?Second
question first, the answer is, “Certainly not.” We
can state, unequivocally, that a cell phone will
never be a standard recommended treatment. However,
it is perfectly legitimate to use a device like this
as a stopgap measure, as first aid. Much more
importantly, however, demonstrations like this
indicate a direction to take for developing equipment
that truly is suited for therapy – equipment, in
other words, that makes use of the mechanisms at work
here, while using frequencies that are more natural
and better tolerated than cell phone frequencies.
This brings us now to the answer to the first
question.When
you look at the double helix of the genetic code (see
the illustration), your own DNA is smiling back at
you, so to speak. We hope that you are both satisfied
with each other! In any case, we live in a day and
age that’s not as easy for DNA as it used to be. The
source of the problem is the incredible mix of
electromagnetic waves that we all have to wade
through day after day.When
you first look at it, this fascinating macromolecule,
which resides in the nucleus of every cell in the
body, seems to be a self-contained unit that carries
out its job from within this protected location,
continuously constructing and maintaining the body
from the inside out. It doesn’t seem to worry the
least bit about the world outside.
DNA
Communicates Through LightThis
assumption is false, it turns out – a misjudgment
decades old, because for too long, science has been
studying genetics in an unnecessarily one-sided
manner, based purely in biochemistry, while paying
too little attention to physics.In
truth, DNA is not just a blueprint for constructing
the body; it is also
a storage medium for optical information
as
well as
an organ for communication. The
German biophysicist Fritz-Albert Popp spent many
years studying biophoton emission, i.e., the light
that the body naturally emits. Popp’s studies
indicate that DNA is one of the main suppliers of
biophotons. Through comprehensive studies, he
discovered that DNA is a harmonic oscillator – an
oscillating system with its own particular frequency,
or resonating frequency. Using the length of the DNA
molecule (about two meters, when stretched out), and
the known speed of light, DNA’s own frequency is
calculated as about 150 megahertz. And that brings us
to cell phones: The standard frequencies of modern
telecommunication businesses all use (numerous) upper
harmonic waves in this frequency. This means: The
electromagnetic waves emitted from the cell phone’s
antenna cause the DNA to resonate – this molecule
that we carry in every cell.Now,
electromagnetic waves are not, in themselves, bad.
Electromagnetic frequencies (for example, the
Schumann frequencies, which are generated during
storms) have always existed in nature and are even
necessary for life. This was clearly demonstrated
during cosmonauts’ long-term stays aboard the MIR
space station. In orbit, where there are no Schumann
frequencies, cosmonauts developed various symptoms in
the general area of chronic fatigue and immune
deficiency syndrome (CFIDS syndrome). This
immediately changed when the electromagnetic
conditions of normal earth atmosphere were
artificially recreated on board
MIR.As
regards technical equipment frequencies, which
constitute the lion’s portion of frequencies
encountered in our current industrial society, it
becomes particularly critical when the frequencies
are not just pure sine waves, but are instead
modulated or pulsed radiation – in other words, when
information is imposed on the
oscillation.Biophysicist
Prof. Lebrecht von Klitzing explained why: “If strict
periodicity is imposed on a quasi-chaotic system such
as the human body, then the body’s organization
becomes different. Whether that is good or bad is the
next question.”An
important difference between healthy natural
frequencies and harmful technical equipment
frequencies is that technical equipment frequencies
exhibit regularities that are not found in nature.
Natural forms are always based on the principal of
similarity and resonance; thus, they do not repeat
(the vortex principle). The frequencies of technical
equipment, on the other hand, are based on rigid
repetition of a set pattern.
[Natural frequencies are asymmetrical in their flow,
while technically generated frequencies are
symmetrical. Here is another fundamental difference
between natural and technical frequencies: Natural
electromagnetic frequencies are based on the
principle of pulsed direct current fields. Our
technology, meanwhile, is based on alternating
current fields, which have effects diametrically
opposed to nature.
-
|
Alternating current fields generate
friction (heat) and loss of energy
(entropy) instead of the frictionless
increase in energy (syntropy) known in
nature.
|
-
|
Alternating current fields generate
depolarity, and consequently degeneration,
instead of polarity and
evolution.
|
-
|
For this reason, alternating current
fields create chaos (dissonance) in living
systems, while naturally pulsed direct
current fields create order (resonance). –
Ed.]
|
Von
Klitzings studies show that pulsed radiation, and
radiation that is otherwise modulated in its
frequency, cause measurable changes in the human
body. As a rule, we automatically interpret these
changes as bad
[which indeed they are, because they are produced by
unnatural microwave technology.—Ed.]
But
everything has two sides, and so people can also
obtain healing effects in the body from appropriately
modulated frequencies.
[These frequencies cannot be based on today’s
standard microwave technology, since this technology
is fundamentally wrong! – We cannot emphasize that
enough. – Ed.].The
principles have been worked out by
Dr. Piotr P. Garjajev and
his colleagues at the Russian Academy of Science in
Moscow.
Genes
Speak Our LanguageGarjajev’s
findings go far beyond Popp’s: According to
Garjajev’s studies, DNA is not only the transmitter
and receiver of electromagnetic radiation (in the
form of energy), but it also absorbs information
contained in the radiation and interprets it further.
Thus, DNA is an extremely complex interactive optical
biochip. In our book
Vernetzte Intelligenz (Cross-Linked
Intelligence)
we wrote the following on this
subject:“For
example, today we speak almost matter-of-factly about
the “genetic code,” that is, about a systematic
codification of information. However, genetics to
date has gotten stuck at this point, and has relied
exclusively on chemistry to finish the work, without
even once calling in language
experts.“In
Moscow, things are different. There, the genetic code
was…additionally subjected to thorough examination by
linguists. (Linguistics is the science of the
structure and formation of languages). When studying
a language, people investigate regularities such as
syntax (rules for building words from letters),
semantics (the study of the content meaning of
words), and rules of grammar.“When
this scientific knowledge is applied to the genetic
code, it can be seen that this code follows the same
rules as our human languages.“It
should be noted: not the rules of a particular
language (in this case, for example, the Russian
language), but rather rules at a fundamental level
where common features reside among all existing
languages of mankind. Thus, the structure of the
genetic code can be connected with every existing
human language.“Scientists
have been seeking the ancestral human language for
centuries – Piotr Garjajev and his colleagues may
have found it.”
(…)
If you want to know more about the
issue containing this article click
here.
|
|